Question 1
16 marksRead Interpretations A and B below, then answer parts (a), (b) and (c).
Interpretation A: from the memoirs of a retired Prussian army officer who had served at the Kaiser's court before 1914, published in Germany in 1925.
Written for practice: not a real historical interpretation.
When I entered the Kaiser's service, Germany was becoming the greatest power in Europe. Our factories and shipyards were the envy of the world, our army the finest ever seen, and the new battleships gave the Reich its proper place among the nations. The Kaiser understood that Germany needed strength, not endless talk in the Reichstag. Working men were given insurance and protection in the factories; those who still followed the socialists did so out of envy, not out of need.
Interpretation B: from an interview with a man who worked in a Hamburg shipyard before 1914 and belonged to a trade union and the SPD, recorded in West Germany in 1960 for a local history project.
Written for practice: not a real historical interpretation.
People forget what the Kaiser's Germany was really like. We elected a Reichstag, but it could not choose the government: the Kaiser picked his Chancellor, and the generals were listened to long before any deputy. Millions of marks went on battleships while we worked eleven hours in the yards and lived four to a room. That is why so many of us joined the union and voted Social Democrat, until by 1912 we were the largest party in the Reichstag — and still nothing changed.
Q1 How do the interpretations differ
How does Interpretation B differ from Interpretation A about Kaiser Wilhelm II's rule of Germany, 1890–1914?
Explain your answer based on what it says in Interpretations A and B.
Q2 Why do the interpretations differ
Why might the authors of Interpretations A and B have a different interpretation about Kaiser Wilhelm II's rule of Germany, 1890–1914?
Explain your answer using Interpretations A and B and your contextual knowledge.
Q3 Which interpretation is more convincing
Which interpretation gives the more convincing opinion about Kaiser Wilhelm II's rule of Germany, 1890–1914?
Explain your answer based on your contextual knowledge and what it says in Interpretations A and B.