GUEST POST
Shaan K is a Law student at the University of Warwick and a specialist GCSE English Tutor on Sherpa. He achieved ten Grade 9s at GCSE and an A* in A-Level English Language at Merchant Taylors’ School, ranked first in his cohort.
His online tutoring focuses on one thing: teaching students exactly what examiners reward, and the structures that deliver it under exam pressure.
By Shaan Kalyan | GCSE English Specialist | Sherpa Tutor
One of my first students came to me with a predicted Grade 4 in English. His parents had seen the number on his end-of-year report and read it the way most families do: as a fixed measurement of ability, the same way you'd read a height chart. They were stressed, and understandably so.
In the new 1-9 grading system, 4 is technically a pass, but plenty of sixth form courses ask for more, and it leaves no margin for a bad day in the exam hall. Here is how that story ended. By the time he sat the real exam, he came out with a Grade 8.
That jump sounds dramatic, and I understand why parents find it hard to believe. It happens more often than you would think, and the reason it happens tells you almost everything you need to know about what a predicted grade actually is.
A predicted grade is a snapshot. It tells you how your child performed on a handful of internal assessments at one point in Year 10, marked by their own teachers, under their school's own policy. It is useful information. It is not a forecast.
The evidence backs this up. In December 2025, FFT Education Datalab published a study comparing predicted grades with real exam results across 740 schools, covering around a million individual predictions. In all but four subjects, most predictions did not match the grade the student went on to achieve. In English Literature, only 34 per cent of predictions matched the final result. Put another way, roughly two in three English Literature predictions turned out to be wrong at the level of the individual child.
This nuance matters, because it should stop you panicking as well as stop you relaxing. Schools were broadly accurate on average across a whole year group. It was individual children who routinely landed a grade above or below the number on the report. The study also found the biggest gaps sat right at the borderline between grades 3 and 4, which is exactly where the stakes feel highest for families.
So, a predicted 4 does not mean your child is a 4. It means their realistic range is currently something like 3 to 5, and where they land inside or above that range depends on what happens between now and next June.
Maths has right answers. English is marked on how a student answers, and research on marking consistency shows this affects English more than almost any other subject. Most parents hear that and worry. I read it the opposite way. A grade that depends on technique is a grade you can change, because technique can be taught.
After tutoring GCSE English students, the same two patterns come up repeatedly.
The first is over-writing without a structure. A student writes a huge amount on the early questions, then runs out of time for the questions carrying the most marks. They know the material. What they are missing is a structure with timings attached. It is like cooking from a recipe with no quantities and no timings written down. All the right ingredients, and the dish still goes wrong.
The second is not knowing what the examiner rewards. Almost none of the students I meet have ever read the mark scheme they are being graded against. Here is what the gap looks like in practice. A Grade 5 answer spots a simile in the extract, names it, and moves on to the next quote. A Grade 8 answer stops inside that simile, picks out the single most loaded word, and explains what that one word does to the reader. Same extract, same quote, several marks apart.
The students scoring 8s and 9s have usually just been shown exactly what the examiner wants from each question, and they follow a structure that delivers it every time. That is a learnable skill, the same as times tables.
Both problems are mechanical. Mechanical problems have mechanical fixes.
In Year 11, any work on exam technique competes with mocks, coursework deadlines and eight other subjects. Over the summer it competes with nothing. An hour a week in August is quietly worth several in February, when everything else is fighting for your child's attention.
Here is what I would do between now and September.
The number on the July report is where your child is standing today. The data says that number will move for most students between now and next June. The only question is which direction, and that mostly comes down to what happens over the next six weeks, while there is still room in the week to work on it calmly.
This is the work I do with Year 10 students every summer: finding exactly where the marks are leaking and building the structures that stop it, one short session at a time.
If you feel your child needs additional support and you're not sure whether a tutor would help, let’s have a free introduction meeting and discuss it. My profile is linked on this page.
If your child's report raised the same worry as the phone call I described at the start, feel free to send me a message and tell me what the report said. I will tell you honestly whether it is a technique problem, and what six weeks of little and often can do about it before September arrives.
Shaan
Tutor
I turn Grade 5-6 students into 8-9 by decoding the mark scheme system behind my 10 Grade 9s | Warwick Law 1st Predicted
Sherpa has hundreds of qualified and experienced UK tutors who are ready to help you achieve your goals. Search through our tutors and arrange a free 20 minute introduction through our industry-leading online classroom.
Find a TutorSimilar Articles