Question 7(b): Comparing Ideas and Perspectives Flashcards
All 43 cards in this deck
In a comparison, how can you make a similarity more perceptive?
Show the similarity, then refine it: "Both guides physically carry their clients through, but one does it gently and the other by force." Noticing how alike things differ suits Question 7(b). In 7(a), which asks only for similarities, stop at the shared point.
What is a writer's perspective on Paper 2?
Their overall point of view on the topic, shaped by who they are, when they wrote and what they experienced. Question 7(b) asks you to compare the writers' ideas and perspectives, not the events.
What is the difference between a writer's feeling, attitude and perspective?
A feeling is an emotion at a moment (panic). An attitude is a settled stance towards something (disapproving of tourists). A perspective is the wider viewpoint behind both (a local who resents change).
How can you make your description of a writer's attitude more precise?
Swap vague words (happy, sad, bad) for exact ones, and qualify them: "wryly amused", "reluctantly impressed", "anxious but determined". Choose the word that fits the text; don't force in a memorised one.
In "Naturally, the council assures us the new car park will 'transform' the high street," what is the writer's attitude?
Sceptical, even sarcastic. "Naturally" suggests the claim is predictable, and the inverted commas around 'transform' show the writer doesn't believe it.
In "I had expected to loathe the place. By the third day I was planning my return," what happens to the writer's attitude?
It shifts from prejudice to enthusiasm. Two short, contrasting sentences mark the turning point clearly, so the reader sees how far the writer's view has moved.
Why is it worth tracking whether a writer's attitude changes during a text?
Perspectives often develop, e.g. dread that turns into delight. Saying "at first… but by the end…" shows detailed understanding of the whole text, which is what the higher levels reward.
What does it mean if a writer's attitude is ambivalent?
They hold two conflicting feelings at once, e.g. fascinated and frightened. Naming both sides is more perceptive than picking one.
How can a writer's time and situation help explain their perspective?
A writer from the 1950s may describe a world without phones or cheap flights; a 21st-century writer may take both for granted. Mention this briefly to explain why the perspectives differ; don't drift into a history essay.
How can you find a writer's overall viewpoint quickly?
Read the introduction line, the first and last paragraphs, and the writer's judging words (adjectives, adverbs, verbs of feeling). Ask: what impression do they want to leave me with?
How are tone and attitude connected?
Tone is how the writing sounds (mocking, earnest, weary); attitude is what the writer thinks. Tone is evidence for attitude: "The mocking tone reveals her contempt for…"
In "It was, I suppose, a kind of triumph — if arriving soaked, late and alone counts as triumph," what attitude does the writer show?
Wry self-mockery. The hesitant "I suppose" and the deflating list "soaked, late and alone" undercut the word "triumph", so the writer laughs at his own failure.
Give four connectives for comparing differences.
Whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand (also unlike, however, conversely).
Give four connectives for comparing similarities.
Similarly, likewise, in the same way, equally (also both writers…, just as…).
What is the difference between an integrated and a block comparison?
Integrated: each paragraph covers both texts on one point. Block: all of Text 1, then all of Text 2. Integrated keeps the comparison going all the way through; block often ends up barely comparing.
What does comparing "like with like" mean?
Comparing the same aspect in both texts, e.g. each writer's attitude to danger, rather than two unrelated points.
What does a strong Question 7(b) comparison paragraph contain?
A point of comparison about the writers' ideas or perspectives; for Text 1 a short quotation and how it's presented (language, structure, tone); a comparative connective; the same for Text 2; a final sentence on why the perspectives are alike or differ.
How many points of comparison should a Question 7(b) answer make?
Usually three or four well-developed ones, with references balanced across both texts. Examiners reward the quality and range of the comparisons, not the number of quotations.
How can you compare two writers who feel the same thing?
Look for differences of degree or reason: "Both writers are amazed, but one writer's awe is quiet and reflective while the other's spills over into excitement." That is more perceptive than "both are amazed".
Which is the better comparison, and why? (a) "Text 1 is about a ship. Text 2 is about a ferry." (b) "While the writer of Text 1 treats the storm as a comic ordeal, the writer of Text 2 finds it exhilarating."
(b). It compares attitudes to the same thing, like with like. (a) only compares subject matter.
Why should you embed short quotations in a comparison?
Weaving a few words into your sentence keeps the focus on precise language, makes analysing single words easy, and saves time for comparing.
How should you finish a Question 7(b) answer?
Optionally, with one or two sentences summing up the key difference in perspective and why it exists (era, experience, purpose). Don't simply repeat earlier points.
What does Paper 2 Question 7(b) ask, and how many marks is it worth?
14 marks, AO3. 'Compare how the writers of Text 1 and Text 2 present ideas and perspectives about…' a topic. Three bullets steer you to the writers' ideas and perspectives, the way each one presents them, and the similarities and differences.
What happens if you write about only one text in detail in Question 7(b)?
The answer can't go above the top of Level 2, which is 5 marks. Unbalanced answers can't reach Level 3, where both writers' ideas and perspectives must be explained alongside a range of comparisons.
What are the five levels for Question 7(b)?
1–2: no real comparison. 3–5: obvious comparisons. 6–8: a range of comparisons. 9–11: a wide range, with references balanced across both texts. 12–14: a varied and comprehensive range, with analysis of how the ideas are presented and discriminating references.
How long should you spend on Question 7(b)?
About 20 minutes: it's the last reading question and worth 14 marks, so make sure you've left time for it.
What counts as 'how they are presented' in Question 7(b)?
The writers' methods: theme, language and structure, plus tone, form and viewpoint. Comment on how each writer conveys their ideas, not just what the ideas are.
What topic should Question 7(b) compare the writers' ideas about?
The one the question names, which is usually broader than 7(a)'s focus (picnics in 7(a), family events in 7(b)). Examiners criticise comparing the texts in general instead of the writers' perspectives on that topic.
Should Question 7(b) include similarities, differences or both?
Both. The bullet says 'how they are similar/different'. A comparison that notices how writers who agree still feel differently is especially strong.
What is a sensible structure for Question 7(b)?
An opening sentence comparing the two perspectives overall, then three or four paragraphs that each compare one idea across both texts, with a method and short quotation from each. A brief final judgement on why the perspectives differ is optional.
How is Question 7(b) different from Paper 2 Question 3?
Question 3 analyses one text. 7(b) is about comparison: every paragraph should move between the two writers, explaining how each presents their view.
Which is a 7(b) comparison? (a) 'Text 1 is a newspaper report and Text 2 is a memoir.' (b) 'Both writers present the storm as destructive, but the report keeps a distance with facts and figures, while the memoir makes the loss personal through one family's story.'
(b). It compares the writers' perspectives on the same topic and how each presents it. (a) only labels the texts.
What does "how the ideas are presented" cover in Question 7(b)?
The writers' methods: theme, language, structure, tone, form and viewpoint. You compare not just what each writer thinks, but how they get it across.
How can you compare two writers' tones?
Name each tone precisely and link it to the perspective: 'The report's calm, factual tone keeps the disaster at a distance, whereas the memoir's anxious, personal tone puts us inside it.'
How can text type be a point of comparison in Question 7(b)?
A news report, a memoir and a magazine column present ideas differently because of their purpose and audience. Comparing them explains why the writers' presentation differs.
How can you compare the structure of two texts?
Compare how each opens, builds and ends: one may start with facts and end with a personal story, the other the reverse. Explain what each choice does to the writer's perspective.
Can two writers use the same method for different effects?
Yes, and it's a strong comparison: 'Both use lists, but Text 1's list of damaged buildings shows destruction, while Text 2's list of picnic food shows plenty.'
How can first-person and third-person viewpoints be compared?
A first-person writer presents ideas through personal experience, which feels intimate; a third-person writer can seem more objective and authoritative. Explain how that shapes each perspective.
How do you compare imagery across two texts?
Choose an image from each about the same idea, then compare what the comparisons suggest: 'Text 1 compares the crowd to a tide, suggesting it is unstoppable; Text 2's crowd is "a family", suggesting warmth.'
Why should you compare openings and endings?
They show what each writer wants the reader to notice first and to remember last, which often reveals their perspective most clearly.
Text 1 describes a storm through official statements and figures. Text 2 describes the same kind of storm through a child's memory. Write one comparison of how the ideas are presented.
For example: 'Whereas Text 1 presents the storm through official voices and figures, giving an authoritative but distant view, Text 2 presents it through a child's eyes, so the fear feels personal and immediate.'
Is this a comparison of presentation? 'Text 1 thinks holidays are relaxing and Text 2 thinks they are stressful.'
Not yet. It compares ideas only. Add how each is presented: '…Text 1 through slow, sensory description of the beach, Text 2 through a frantic list of things that went wrong.'
How much of a Question 7(b) answer should be about methods?
Enough that every comparison says how the ideas are conveyed. The top levels reward analysis of how theme, language and structure are used across the texts, not a list of ideas.